An innovator in contemporary thought on economic and political development looks here at decline rather than growth. Albert O. Hirschman makes a basic distinction between alternative ways of reacting to deterioration in business firms and, in general, to dissatisfaction with organizations: one, "exit," is for the member to quit the organization or for the customer to switch to the competing product, and the other, "voice," is for members or customers to agitate and exert influence for change "from within." The efficiency of the competitive mechanism, with its total reliance on exit, is questioned for certain important situations. As exit often undercuts voice while being unable to counteract decline, loyalty is seen in the function of retarding exit and of permitting voice to play its proper role. The interplay of the three concepts turns out to illuminate a wide range of economic, social, and political phenomena. As the author states in the preface, "having found my own unifying way of looking at issues as diverse as competition and the two-party system, divorce and the American character, black power and the failure of 'unhappy' top officials to resign over Vietnam, I decided to let myself go a little."
......(更多)
作者:(美)艾伯特·O.赫希曼 译者:卢昌崇
艾伯特·O.赫希曼,1915年生于德国柏林。1941年移民美国,先后在伯克利、耶鲁、哈佛从事研究和教学工作,1974年加入普林斯顿大学高级研究所。赫希曼一生著述颇丰,以英语出版的著作有14部,以其他语言出版的有10部,大多数著作被译成多国语言,如《经济发展战略>)被译成十多国语言。
......(更多)
......(更多)
如果我參與了一項外交政策的制定過程,而且對該政策持反對意見,那麼我可以辭去官方職務。但是,我的國民身份並沒有發生變化,我的國家仍然執行著令我日益憂心的外交政策,我的鬱悶與不快並沒有煙消雲散。
......(更多)