In this major theoretical statement, the author offers a new and provoctive interpretation of institutional transformations associated with modernity. What is modernity? The author suggests, "As a first approximation, let us simply say the following: 'modernity' refers to modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence." We do not as yet, the author argues, live in a post-modern world. The distinctive characteristics of our major social institutions in the closing years of the twentieth century suggest that, rather than entering into a period of post-modernity, we are moving into a period of "high modernity" in which the consequences of modernity are becoming more radicalized and universalized than before. A post-modern social universe may eventualy come into being, but this as yet lies on the other side of the forms of social and cultural organization that currently dominate world history. In developing a fresh characterization of the nature of modernity, the author concentrates on the themes of "security versus danger and o "trust versus risk. Modernity is a double-edged phenomenon. The development of modern social institutions has created vastly greater opportunities for human beings to enjoy a secure and rewarding existencethan in any type of pre-modern system. But modernity also has a somber side that has become very important in the present century, such as the frequently degrading nature of modern industrial work, the growth of totalitarianism, the threat of environmentsal destruction, and the alrming development of military power and weaponry. The book builds upon the author's pevious theoretical writings and will be of great interest to those who have followed his work through the years. However, this book covers issues the author has not previously analyzed and extends the scope of his work into areas of pressing practical concern.
......(更多)
作者简介:
安东尼·吉登斯(1938— ) 战后英国最重要的社会学家之一,1938年出生于北伦敦的埃德蒙顿,1976年获剑桥大学博士学位,先后任教于莱切斯特大学、西蒙·弗雷泽大学、加州大学洛杉矶分校和剑桥大学,1997年起任伦敦政治经济学院院长。吉登斯一直处于当代社会学理论与实践的发展前沿,他的著作综括了近三十年来的社会政治变革,尤以构成理论和“第三条道路”的学说为全球学界所瞩目。他还是布莱尔政府的重要智囊之一。他的主要著作还有:《社会学》(1982)、《社会的构成》(1984)、《民族国家与暴力》(1985)、《超越左与右》(1994)、《第三条道路》(1998)。
......(更多)
......(更多)
机械钟的发明和在所有社会成员中的实际运用推广,对时间从空间中分离出来具有决定性意义。时钟体现了一种“虚化”时间(empty time)的统一尺度,以这种方式计算,便可精确地设计每日的“分区”,比如,对“工作时间”的确定。
可以从空间和地点相分离的角度来理解“虚化空间”的发展......在前现代社会,空间和地点总是一致的,因为对大多数人来说,在大多数情况下,社会生活的空间维度都是受“在场”的支配。现代性的降临,通过对“缺场”的各种其他要素的孕育,日益把空间从地点分离了出来,从位置上看,远离了任何给定的面对面互动情势。
“现代性以前所未有的方式,把我们抛离了所有类型的社会秩序的轨道,从而形成了其生活形态。在外延和内涵两方面,现代性卷入的变革比过往时代的绝大多数变迁特征都更加意义深远。在外延方面,它们确立了跨越全球的社会联系方式;在内涵方面,它们正在改变我们日常生活中最熟悉和最带个人色彩的领域。”
......(更多)